AWS
Cloud evidence
Roadmap / Direction, not promises
Build trust first. Expand from evidence.
A transparent view of what works now, what we are validating next, and the source-of-truth platform we intend to build.
Roadmap tracker
Now → validate → release evidence
Azure
Cloud evidence
Google Cloud
Cloud evidence
OpenAI
Active model route
Product horizons
Progress is gated by evidence quality.
Roadmap items describe direction and may change. Reliability, tenant isolation, explainability, and reviewer control decide when a capability moves forward.
Available in private accessCore review loop
Make architectural truth operational
The private launch focuses on trustworthy review workflows, not feature volume.
Evidence graph
Code, CI/CD, upload, scanner, and MCP observations reconciled into current truth.
Multi-agent review
Bounded specialist roles produce typed artifacts with evidence IDs, cost, and confidence.
Governed remediation
Static verification and human approval stay between a proposal and a pull request.
Workspace intelligence
Teams can ask grounded questions and inspect the exact context behind an answer.
Release gate
A release stays here until evidence, cost, failure states, and authorization are inspectable in production.
Horizon 1 of 3
How an item moves from idea to available.
01
Problem
A repeated decision or evidence gap
02
Contract
Threat model, data boundary, and acceptance test
03
Partners
Real workflows with visible failure states
04
Release
Documented behavior and operational evidence
Evidence runway
More sources. The same trust contract.
The next phase expands what the system can observe without making unverified absence look like truth or giving an integration ambient authority.
01
Cloud control planes
AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud inventory, identities, network boundaries, deployment state, and protected resources.
02
Change systems
Pull requests, release workflows, ownership, policy decisions, and architecture impact before merge.
03
Data and runtime
Declared stores first, then approved runtime observations that expose drift without retaining customer payloads.
04
Security operations
Scanner, SIEM, posture, and incident evidence reconciled into one current architecture rather than another alert feed.
05
Team decisions
Slack, Jira, review notes, exceptions, and ownership events preserved as governed architecture memory.
06
Private evidence
Scoped MCP clients and private endpoints for internal systems that cannot or should not leave the customer boundary.
Long-term discipline
The roadmap can move. These principles do not.
Dates are deliberately absent until the evidence says a capability is ready. Direction remains public so design partners can challenge the order and the contract.
No silent autonomy
Models may prepare actions, but permission and explicit confirmation still decide whether anything changes.
No clean verdict from missing data
Coverage gaps remain visible and cannot be converted into confidence by wording or model choice.
No provider lock-in disguised as architecture
Provider routing is a policy decision under one evidence and cost contract.
No release without operations
Replay, recovery, failure visibility, audit history, and support behavior ship with the feature.
Help shape the evidence contract before broad launch.
Design partners get a direct line into review workflows, missing context, provider policy, and the standards that gate public availability.